The Trials of Art.
Edited by Daniel McClean.
RidingHouse, London, 2008. 380 pp., 30 black & white illustrations., 6¾x9¼".
Who should have the authority to determine what is art: artists, critics and curators, or lawyers, judges and juries? Should artistic expression always be immune from legal and ethical constraints? Should the law always protect artists and art works? Since the Renaissance, artists have been involved in trials both as claimants and defendants. Artists have appeared in trials in order to assert their rights (from Albrecht Dürer to Constantin Brancusi, to Richard Serra) and as violators of the law (from Michaelangelo to Honoré Daumier, to Jeff Koons).
nspired by important trials during the modern period in which artists and art works have acted as protagonists, this anthology of essays from fourteen leading academics and lawyers examines the ambivalent encounter between art and the law. In considering these issues, the book illuminates how the art trial has been instrumental in the development of art and the shaping of the law, and reflects upon wider issues; including the position of the artist in relation to society, the power todetermine how images are created and viewed and the struggle between individual expression and collective beliefs.
Essays by: Sadakat Kadri, Martha Buskirk, Thierry de Duve, Costas Douzinas, Andrew Causey, Anthony Julius, Henry Lydiate, Judith Bresler, Christina Michalos, Lisa Rosendahl, Michael Spence, Cristina Martinez, Hubert Klocker, Adam Strevens, Guy Vassall-Adams, Alison Young, Michael White, Daniel McClean & Armen Avanessian. With an introduction by Lord Hoffmann.